Simply Interesting


31
Aug 10

What a dick move, HP – LICENSES Navy’s own network info back to Navy

Just to make sure its core networks keep running – to make sure marines and sailors can keep e-mailing each other on Oct. 1st — the Navy is paying Hewlett Packard $1.788 billion. Booz Allen Hamilton, another outside contractor, handled the negotiations with Hewlett-Packard for the military. The service will spend another $1.6 billion to buy from HP the equipment troops have worked on for years, and to license the network diagrams and configuration documents, so that the Navy can begin to plan for a future in which they’re not utterly reliant on HP for their most basic communications. In essence, the Navy is paying to look at the blueprints to the network it has been using for a decade.

via HP Holds Navy Network ‘Hostage’ for $3.3 Billion | Danger Room | Wired.com.


4
Aug 10

For-Profit Colleges Caught On Video Encouraging Financial Aid Fraud

From the article at the Consumerist (linked below):

According to the Dept. of Education, enrollment in for-profit colleges has exploded in recent years, growing nearly 500%. Last year alone, students at for-profit colleges received more than $4 billion in Pell Grants and more than $20 billion in federal loans. With all that money floating around, the Government Accountability Office was asked to investigate — and their findings will probably not please taxpayers.

The GAO sent a handful of investigators undercover as prospective students to 15 different for-profit colleges in six states and the District of Columbia. Among the colleges investigated were some that received at least 89% of their revenue from federal student aid.

Investigators found that all 15 colleges “made deceptive or otherwise questionable statements to GAOs undercover applicants,” and four of them “encouraged fraudulent practices.”

Once registered, GAO’s prospective students began receiving calls within 5 minutes. One fictitious prospective student received more than 180 phone calls in a month. Calls were received at all hours of the day, as late as 11 p.m.

To help this sink in further:

A student interested in a massage therapy certificate costing $14,000 at a for-profit college was told that the program was a good value. However the same certificate from a local community college cost $520.

via For-Profit Colleges Caught On Video Encouraging Financial Aid Fraud – The Consumerist.


31
Jul 10

What are YOU doing to change the world?

“These kids deserve better than that” declares one inventor. He took what some, even himself, said wasn’t possible, and then made it so. Its not about what you do for yourself, its about what you do for your community.

Which side of that fence are you on?


29
Jun 10

CCIE Emeritus: Whats the point?

CCIE Emeritus – CCIE  | Cisco Systems

Dear God why?

Someone please explain to me why?

No really, what is the point?


28
Jun 10

Intellectual Freedom Manual debuts today | OIF Blog

The newly revised and updated eighth edition of the Intellectual Freedom Manual makes its debut TODAY at the ALA Store at the 2010 ALA Annual Conference in Washington, D.C.  The Manual also is available online at www.alastore.ala.org (search for Intellectual Freedom Manual).

via OIF Blog » It’s here! 8th Edition of the Intellectual Freedom Manual debuts today – plus, a new companion website!.


24
Jun 10

Uncle Sam and 1,100 data centers – the culture of complacency.

Earlier this year, the White House announced an initiative to shrink the federal governments overall real estate footprint as a way to shave $3 billion off the federal budget. The initiative covers government-owned facilities of all sorts, including—or, perhaps, especially—Uncle Sams 1,100 data centers.

The announcement of a Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative DCCI was music to the IT industrys ears, and storage giant NetApp immediately commissioned a study to gauge the programs prospects for success.

What NetApp found, probably to its dismay, is that while most federal IT professionals agree that more data center sharing among agencies is a good idea 76 percent, far fewer believe that its feasible for their particular agency to share resources with another 49 percent. Its also the case that everyone knows that the other agencies dont want to give up their own data centers, with 86 percent of the surveys correspondents citing government culture as the number one obstacle to consolidation. In spite of the culture factor, 63 percent of those surveyed were confident that consolidation would happen eventually, but most 74 percent were in agreement that the White Houses timetable is unrealistic.

via Does Uncle Sam really need 1,100 data centers?.

Believe me, after working in and around government for the last ~10 years or so, government culture is the single largest problem and obstacle it must overcome for itself.

The culture is very anti-collaborative and here is why: Job Security.

Every function in government is treated by the people responsible for them as a financial asset of sorts. If you dont use it, you lose it. If you cant justify why you need to have it, theres no need for you to have it. If youre no longer providing value for your part in the overall picture, theres no reason for you to be here.

So what happens? People build false walls around everything they do. They create these false barriers to justify why the government cannot function or succeed without them, even if it means you have to figuratively lock yourself in a corner and thus be less productive, which gets turned around as a justification to need more resources. After all, this is what creates job security.

I [obviously] work in IT in the government sector. I see this all the time – “This is mine, not yours”. “Why should I help them – they don’t help me” or “We are not paid/We are not funded to support this/that”,  ”Thats not my job, if they want that done then they need to fund us to do that”, and my favorite “Why do I need to do this? I see no need for it.”

The problem is that this is true, but only superficially. Everyone is empowered to change their own workforce culture and show the leadership how and why it works. The problem is that no one really has the balls, or brains to actually do it.

Most people managing IT in the government that Ive met don’t really have the first clue what they’re doing anyway.

This is both sad and depressing.


23
Jun 10

You’re doing it wrong…

Sometimes I really wonder how intelligent the world is these days…


19
Jun 10

Trouble at Cisco? Cisco influencing corporate Social Media Policy, but why are they trying?

Is Cisco grasping for straws with publicly releasing this social media policy, or are they genuinely interested in shaping policy in this environment? Many questions exist about their motivations and the evidence questioning their integrity on the matter is substantive.

Wait WHAT? What the hell is Cisco doing dabbling in Social Media?

Cisco has been heavily criticized over the years, mostly for having “Dell” hardware with “Apple” pricing. Other criticisms involve a lack of genuine ingenuity – operating much like Microsoft, purchasing companies and their technology, rebranding it, and sometimes breaking it in the process… their wireless and security offerings being most notable.

They were late to the security sector and despite their size and talent, still dont quite stack up to the diversity and capability of their competitors. However this specifically is changing, and Im personally impressed with their Borderless Networks. The question is if its too late to introduce this technology, if its really needed by most corporations, and if its too early to introduce it given current economic conditions?

Cisco is moving in to the datacenter market with the release of the Nexus 7000 Datacenter switch, but they are moving in on the turf of heavyweights like IBM and HP. Not surprisingly HP has decided to move in on Ciscos turf as well… an eye for an eye I suppose?

Culturally speaking, the “old timer” employees of the company often speak about how the company has been “corporatized”, how it is not what it once was – its culture is no longer what made itself Cisco.

The value of the CCIE has drastically reduced from what used to be a 110k+ salary range, is now, in an although not scientific but eerily similar study to many other sources, only 10K higher than a CCNP, but costs thousands of dollars more to achieve. Less salary translates to less value. But what can a CCIE do that a seasoned CCNP cannot? Or any other CCNP/DP or combination thereof for that matter?

Reduction in World Wide CCIE’s has allegedly caused Cisco to stop publicly posting their World Wide CCIE stats on their website.

Whats going on Cisco? You seem to be floundering around like a fish out of water. You have to overcome 20+ years of marketing and branding as a routing/switching technology company to be successful outside of it. Thats going to be hard for you ya know? I mean, when you bought Linksys you tried to get in to the consumer market… but your still failing despite buying Flip Video for their camcorders, and youve just released your lackluster, underachieveing and overpriced Valet Router line for home and small business.

So just how is that move in to the consumer market going for you – you cant simply buy your way in to every market you want to be successful in. The only product youve really built yourself from the ground up was Telepresence and that actually turned out really well!

But what can we expect from a company where its very culture has been based on buying things other people make, only to sell that product under its own name?

Side note: And this despite 1/3 of its company are engineers, and another 1/3 are sales. The remaining 1/3 must be trying to figure out what to buy so the other 2/3 can figure out how to sell a product thats not quite, but soon to be broken… ok I *might* be going a little too far with that one. There is no denying the hardware engineering in Cisco’s product line is impressive, especially given the new CRS-3, but back to the point – why so dependent on acquisitions?

But what can we expect from a company whose success in the route/switch market dominance was founded from the first company it purchased in 1993, Crescendo Communications. You see, Crescendo made a product whose name still exists in Cisco’s product line to this day… Catalyst Switches. Half of Ciscos entire core route/switch market is the Catalyst switch line.

Perhaps Cisco should stop grasping for straws and actually do something original instead of trying to stick its hands in to every market it possibly can. It turned out pretty well with Telepresence, not so much with wireless (WLC’s or the WCS) or some of their security offerings (MARS).

Hey Cisco, you make hardware! Take to your own advice and stick to building your strengths. Youll never do terribly well in any other market and you know what? Thats okay!

Anyway, here is Cisco’s Social Media Policy:


17
May 10

Glenn Becks war on the FCC and Satan worshippers

This guy is already the circus clown of political commentary, evading any responsibility or accountability for what he says, all under the guise of “entertainment” (like calling Obama a racist - remember that one?) but I simply can’t let this slide.

Let’s be real, in my opinion he’s really just an inept idiot with no genuine integrity for anything he says, even in the act of his well known “fake crying”. He’s a recovered drug and alcohol addict with no college degree, million dollar contracts, and people who write his books for him, but yet tries to offer insight and influence on topics that he was either “self taught” or didnt even bother to consult wikipedia about (as elementary as that is).

His show really amounts to nothing more than passing along viewpoints from the Republican Party’s media corporation, Fox News. Jon Stewart’s “The Daily Show” has an entire page devoted just to the hypocritical things Beck says, and how moronic it not only makes himself look, but Fox News as well. I suppose his “success” says more about the quality of the American publics true interest in politics than it does about the clown that “delivers” it.

Fox constantly touts their ratings and tries to synonymize popularity as credibility, but anyone who has survived high school knows that popularity has nothing to do with relevance.

So what has he done to warrant my attention now? This gem from his latest episode in which he tries to talk about an issue he clearly doesn’t have the capacity to understand:

Right-wing talker Glenn Beck took to his Fox News TV program last Monday night to deliver a rant about how President Obama has compiled something “almost like an enemys list” and how Obama is into “silencing opponents.” The presidents tool of choice for this censorship? Network neutrality—the principle that ISPs cannot interfere with content.

via Glenn Becks war on the FCC and Satan worshippers.

Apparently his “Arguing with Idiots” book is an auto-biography.


24
Apr 10

2010 IT Salary Report: Where do you stack up?

Download it here: 2010 SalaryReport