Internet and Society


31
Aug 10

What a dick move, HP – LICENSES Navy’s own network info back to Navy

Just to make sure its core networks keep running – to make sure marines and sailors can keep e-mailing each other on Oct. 1st — the Navy is paying Hewlett Packard $1.788 billion. Booz Allen Hamilton, another outside contractor, handled the negotiations with Hewlett-Packard for the military. The service will spend another $1.6 billion to buy from HP the equipment troops have worked on for years, and to license the network diagrams and configuration documents, so that the Navy can begin to plan for a future in which they’re not utterly reliant on HP for their most basic communications. In essence, the Navy is paying to look at the blueprints to the network it has been using for a decade.

via HP Holds Navy Network ‘Hostage’ for $3.3 Billion | Danger Room | Wired.com.


28
Jun 10

Intellectual Freedom Manual debuts today | OIF Blog

The newly revised and updated eighth edition of the Intellectual Freedom Manual makes its debut TODAY at the ALA Store at the 2010 ALA Annual Conference in Washington, D.C.  The Manual also is available online at www.alastore.ala.org (search for Intellectual Freedom Manual).

via OIF Blog » It’s here! 8th Edition of the Intellectual Freedom Manual debuts today – plus, a new companion website!.


26
Jun 10

The National Cyberspace Strategy | The White House

This draft policy (below) is based on the President’s Cyberspace Policy Review (bottom). I have embedded both your your convenience.

View more documents from Thomas Jones.

24
Jun 10

Uncle Sam and 1,100 data centers – the culture of complacency.

Earlier this year, the White House announced an initiative to shrink the federal governments overall real estate footprint as a way to shave $3 billion off the federal budget. The initiative covers government-owned facilities of all sorts, including—or, perhaps, especially—Uncle Sams 1,100 data centers.

The announcement of a Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative DCCI was music to the IT industrys ears, and storage giant NetApp immediately commissioned a study to gauge the programs prospects for success.

What NetApp found, probably to its dismay, is that while most federal IT professionals agree that more data center sharing among agencies is a good idea 76 percent, far fewer believe that its feasible for their particular agency to share resources with another 49 percent. Its also the case that everyone knows that the other agencies dont want to give up their own data centers, with 86 percent of the surveys correspondents citing government culture as the number one obstacle to consolidation. In spite of the culture factor, 63 percent of those surveyed were confident that consolidation would happen eventually, but most 74 percent were in agreement that the White Houses timetable is unrealistic.

via Does Uncle Sam really need 1,100 data centers?.

Believe me, after working in and around government for the last ~10 years or so, government culture is the single largest problem and obstacle it must overcome for itself.

The culture is very anti-collaborative and here is why: Job Security.

Every function in government is treated by the people responsible for them as a financial asset of sorts. If you dont use it, you lose it. If you cant justify why you need to have it, theres no need for you to have it. If youre no longer providing value for your part in the overall picture, theres no reason for you to be here.

So what happens? People build false walls around everything they do. They create these false barriers to justify why the government cannot function or succeed without them, even if it means you have to figuratively lock yourself in a corner and thus be less productive, which gets turned around as a justification to need more resources. After all, this is what creates job security.

I [obviously] work in IT in the government sector. I see this all the time – “This is mine, not yours”. “Why should I help them – they don’t help me” or “We are not paid/We are not funded to support this/that”,  ”Thats not my job, if they want that done then they need to fund us to do that”, and my favorite “Why do I need to do this? I see no need for it.”

The problem is that this is true, but only superficially. Everyone is empowered to change their own workforce culture and show the leadership how and why it works. The problem is that no one really has the balls, or brains to actually do it.

Most people managing IT in the government that Ive met don’t really have the first clue what they’re doing anyway.

This is both sad and depressing.


19
Jun 10

Trouble at Cisco? Cisco influencing corporate Social Media Policy, but why are they trying?

Is Cisco grasping for straws with publicly releasing this social media policy, or are they genuinely interested in shaping policy in this environment? Many questions exist about their motivations and the evidence questioning their integrity on the matter is substantive.

Wait WHAT? What the hell is Cisco doing dabbling in Social Media?

Cisco has been heavily criticized over the years, mostly for having “Dell” hardware with “Apple” pricing. Other criticisms involve a lack of genuine ingenuity – operating much like Microsoft, purchasing companies and their technology, rebranding it, and sometimes breaking it in the process… their wireless and security offerings being most notable.

They were late to the security sector and despite their size and talent, still dont quite stack up to the diversity and capability of their competitors. However this specifically is changing, and Im personally impressed with their Borderless Networks. The question is if its too late to introduce this technology, if its really needed by most corporations, and if its too early to introduce it given current economic conditions?

Cisco is moving in to the datacenter market with the release of the Nexus 7000 Datacenter switch, but they are moving in on the turf of heavyweights like IBM and HP. Not surprisingly HP has decided to move in on Ciscos turf as well… an eye for an eye I suppose?

Culturally speaking, the “old timer” employees of the company often speak about how the company has been “corporatized”, how it is not what it once was – its culture is no longer what made itself Cisco.

The value of the CCIE has drastically reduced from what used to be a 110k+ salary range, is now, in an although not scientific but eerily similar study to many other sources, only 10K higher than a CCNP, but costs thousands of dollars more to achieve. Less salary translates to less value. But what can a CCIE do that a seasoned CCNP cannot? Or any other CCNP/DP or combination thereof for that matter?

Reduction in World Wide CCIE’s has allegedly caused Cisco to stop publicly posting their World Wide CCIE stats on their website.

Whats going on Cisco? You seem to be floundering around like a fish out of water. You have to overcome 20+ years of marketing and branding as a routing/switching technology company to be successful outside of it. Thats going to be hard for you ya know? I mean, when you bought Linksys you tried to get in to the consumer market… but your still failing despite buying Flip Video for their camcorders, and youve just released your lackluster, underachieveing and overpriced Valet Router line for home and small business.

So just how is that move in to the consumer market going for you – you cant simply buy your way in to every market you want to be successful in. The only product youve really built yourself from the ground up was Telepresence and that actually turned out really well!

But what can we expect from a company where its very culture has been based on buying things other people make, only to sell that product under its own name?

Side note: And this despite 1/3 of its company are engineers, and another 1/3 are sales. The remaining 1/3 must be trying to figure out what to buy so the other 2/3 can figure out how to sell a product thats not quite, but soon to be broken… ok I *might* be going a little too far with that one. There is no denying the hardware engineering in Cisco’s product line is impressive, especially given the new CRS-3, but back to the point – why so dependent on acquisitions?

But what can we expect from a company whose success in the route/switch market dominance was founded from the first company it purchased in 1993, Crescendo Communications. You see, Crescendo made a product whose name still exists in Cisco’s product line to this day… Catalyst Switches. Half of Ciscos entire core route/switch market is the Catalyst switch line.

Perhaps Cisco should stop grasping for straws and actually do something original instead of trying to stick its hands in to every market it possibly can. It turned out pretty well with Telepresence, not so much with wireless (WLC’s or the WCS) or some of their security offerings (MARS).

Hey Cisco, you make hardware! Take to your own advice and stick to building your strengths. Youll never do terribly well in any other market and you know what? Thats okay!

Anyway, here is Cisco’s Social Media Policy:


24
May 10

danah boyd | apophenia » Quitting Facebook is pointless; challenging them to do better is not

Six clarifying points about one of the most influential social researchers in the industry, danah boyd. The whole article is long, but the content informative, and message insightful.


I want to enumerate six beliefs that I have that I want to flesh out in this post in light of discussions about how “everyone” is leaving Facebook:

  1. I do not believe that people will (or should) leave Facebook because of privacy issues.
  2. I do not believe that the tech elites who are publicly leaving Facebook will affect on the company’s numbers; they are unrepresentative and were not central users in the first place.
  3. I do not believe that an alternative will emerge in the next 2-5 years that will “replace” Facebook in any meaningful sense.
  4. I believe that Facebook will get regulated and I would like to see an open discussion of what this means and what form this takes.
  5. I believe that a significant minority of users are at risk because of decisions Facebook has made and I think that those of us who aren’t owe it to those who are to work through these issues.
  6. I believe that Facebook needs to start a public dialogue with users and those who are concerned ASAP (and Elliot Schrage’s Q&A doesn’t count).

via danah boyd | apophenia » Quitting Facebook is pointless; challenging them to do better is not.


20
May 10

Rogue ISP must liquidate, pay FTC $1.08M

A rogue Internet service provider that hosted and participated in the distribution of spam, malware, and porn has finally been shut down as a result of a request made by the FTC to a district court judge. The ISP, 3FN, has had its servers and assets seized and has been ordered to turn over $1.08 million of its proceeds to the FTC.The FTC first charged 3FN in June 2009 with a number of… really bad things. These included active recruiting of and working with criminals to distribute content such as spyware, trojan horses, phishing schemes, and pornography—including child porn.

The FTC says 3FN advertised its services to like-minded people in the “darkest corners” of the Internet, like chat rooms for spammers.3FN was accused of deploying and operating botnets and bot herders to send spam and execute denial-of-service attacks. It hosted the command-and-control servers that were responsible for the communication of information between the bot herders it recruited and the zombie computers used to mount attacks.

via Rogue ISP ordered to liquidate, pay FTC $1.08 million.


18
Apr 10

Why the Library of Congress cares about archiving our tweets

Why the Library of Congress cares about archiving our tweets.


16
Apr 10

Fred Stutzman on Twitter and the Library of Congress

Twitter and the Library of Congress

by Fred Stutzman

Fred has quite possibly, in one post, covered the entire scope of arguments revolving around the recent news about the Library of Congress archiving every.single.public.tweet.

It’s thought provoking and insightful; I strongly recommend giving it a once-over!

I took one of Fred’s classes on social networks and have been intrigued with his work ever since. I encourage you to read his work and follow him on twitter


15
Apr 10

Did you know?